Creative Destruction - Hindu Style

Creative Destruction - Hindu Style

In October 2008, I was asked at the World Economic Forum along with other experts to address the main challenges facing nanotechnology. While environmental, health and safety concerns had been the preoccupation of many for 2008, this question posed by the WEF combined with the world economic crisis led me to consider the challenges of funding and commercializing of nanotechnology and other emerging technologies for 2009.
We can expect to hear much more of Joseph Schumpeter’s ideas of Creative Destruction  this year as the world comes to terms with the credit crunch, or recession as these events used to be known.  While the depths of a recession can be the best time to start a business, Microsoft is an oft cited example, this is scant consolation for the tens of thousands of companies that will not survive, and the millions who will lose their jobs as a result. An alternative scenario is Nietzsche’s earlier Shiva inspired version of creative destruction, with the new morality standing in the ruins of the old, which may be the long terms fate of a number of financial institutions and economies.

As a result, we published a note today looking at the five most significant issues which we see impacting the world of nanotechnologies in the coming year.

Feel free to disagree on the blog or contact us for more specific information.

Tagged with: clean-techIPONanotechnanotech IPOnanotechnologiesstate aidUK Nanotech
 

5 Responses to Credit Crunch or Creative Destruction

  1. [...] is the original post:  Credit Crunch or Creative Destruction | TNTlog « US Steel Industry Collapsing ! « Socio-Economics History [...]

  2. Andrew Maynard says:

    Insightful – thank Tim

  3. [...] I discussed in the recent article “Credit Crunch or Creative Destruction?“, falling returns is the least of the VC industry’s problems, with many predicted to [...]

  4. [...] I mentioned a couple of weeks ago, I expect to see a number of nanomaterials companies finally go under in 2009. The first to hit [...]

  5. [...] Well, as we predicted,  the reason is that VCs cannot get exits and cannot raise fresh capital for their current [...]