<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nanotech &#8211; the Sucessor to GMO&#8217;s?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cientifica.eu/blog/2009/02/nanotech-the-sucessor-to-gmos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cientifica.eu/blog/2009/02/nanotech-the-sucessor-to-gmos/</link>
	<description>Taking The Rational View of Nanotechnologies Since 2000</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:48:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise Reigada</title>
		<link>http://cientifica.eu/blog/2009/02/nanotech-the-sucessor-to-gmos/comment-page-1/#comment-952</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise Reigada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cientifica.eu/blog/?p=909#comment-952</guid>
		<description>My impression is that all the publicity around nanotechnology for the food industry should have a safe start on food package.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My impression is that all the publicity around nanotechnology for the food industry should have a safe start on food package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
