<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rules of Twitter AND Cricket</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cientifica.eu/blog/2009/03/the-rules-of-twitter-and-cricket/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cientifica.eu/blog/2009/03/the-rules-of-twitter-and-cricket/</link>
	<description>Taking The Rational View of Nanotechnologies Since 2000</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:55:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth Seeley</title>
		<link>http://cientifica.eu/blog/2009/03/the-rules-of-twitter-and-cricket/#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Seeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cientifica.eu/blog/?p=984#comment-1466</guid>
		<description>Finally I understand cricket! Thank you so much. One point Howard raised that hasn&#039;t been taken up by anyone to date is the fact that the story is now floating around on digg with no one of substance commenting on the inappropriateness of the headline.

While we still have mainstream media with us, it&#039;s important to remember that the journalist doesn&#039;t write the headline - that&#039;s slapped on later by copy editors, sub editors, section editors, etc., usually long after the reporter has left the building. I think it&#039;s important, when there&#039;s a disconnect between the headline and the body of the article - to make it clear there&#039;s misrepresentation going on. Even after three years of working in a newsroom I&#039;m not clear why the writers don&#039;t get to do the headlines themselves. I think it&#039;s because it&#039;s believed they don&#039;t understand the marketing process involved in selling newspapers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally I understand cricket! Thank you so much. One point Howard raised that hasn&#8217;t been taken up by anyone to date is the fact that the story is now floating around on digg with no one of substance commenting on the inappropriateness of the headline.</p>
<p>While we still have mainstream media with us, it&#8217;s important to remember that the journalist doesn&#8217;t write the headline &#8211; that&#8217;s slapped on later by copy editors, sub editors, section editors, etc., usually long after the reporter has left the building. I think it&#8217;s important, when there&#8217;s a disconnect between the headline and the body of the article &#8211; to make it clear there&#8217;s misrepresentation going on. Even after three years of working in a newsroom I&#8217;m not clear why the writers don&#8217;t get to do the headlines themselves. I think it&#8217;s because it&#8217;s believed they don&#8217;t understand the marketing process involved in selling newspapers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  cientifica.eu/blog/2009/03/the-rules-of-twitter-and-cricket/feed/ ) in 0.41612 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 3:17 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 4:17 pm UTC -->
<!-- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -->
<!-- Quick Cache Is Fully Functional :-) ... A Quick Cache file was just served for (  cientifica.eu/blog/2009/03/the-rules-of-twitter-and-cricket/feed/ ) in 0.00083 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 3:42 pm UTC. -->
