The Nanobots That Refused To Die

IBM have been fiddling about with nanoscale images for years, from spelling out the letters IBM in Xenon atoms to the latest nanoscale world map. I once asked the late Hans Coufal, head of nanotechnology at IBM’s Almadan research centre whether it was science or marketing, and he indicted the latter. Ever since then, making nanoscale sculptures has been a sure way of getting publicity, whereas researching new methods of circuit manufacture or data storage is far less sexy.

While this bit of work was widely reported, for example here in Forbes, the Foresight Institutes take on it made me chuckle. Apparently

IBM’s researchers hope that it could someday be used to craft circuit boards at smaller sizes than e-beam lithography is used to etch them today, or even build tiny nanobots or other tiny mechanical structures that could travel inside the human body or other nanoscale environments.

Even after 15 years, there a people still clinging to their belief in nanobots, just as some still believe the world is as flat as IBMs version.

Tagged with:
 

Pot, Kettle, Black?

Chief nanobottite Chris Phoenix of the Center for Responsible Nanotechnology and now the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies is back from holiday and he’s on the warpath.

As if those infernal scientists hijacking the term nanotechnology, grabbing all the funding and then chuckling into their sparkling new labware about the viability of Drexlerian nanobots wasn’t enough, someone now has had the temerity to make a rather popular video detailing how to destroy the world using nanobots.

Gah! Imagine the frustration after promoting the concept of nanobots and pondering their ethics for fifteen years just to see your entire life’s work ridiculed by a viral video. It’s enough to make you choke on your morning respirocytes.

The nanobottites rather po-faced conclusion is that “While this video may scare the uninformed, perhaps the actual discussion of molecular manufacturing will emerge stronger and more sensible than before.”

Somehow I doubt it, we’re all too busy rolling on the floor clutching our sides and then we’ll be getting on with something sensible.

Is this nanobot week?

Ray Kurzweil appears to be planning to use nanobots to bring his dead (since 1970) father to life according to this extract from a recent Rolling Stone interview reproduced at RoughType….

Using technology, he plans to bring his dead father back to life. Kurzweil reveals this to me near the end of our conversation … In a soft voice, he explains how the resurrection would work. “We can find some of his DNA around his grave site – that’s a lot of information right there,” he says. “The AI will send down some nanobots and get some bone or teeth and extract some DNA and put it all together. Then they’ll get some information from my brain and anyone else who still remembers him.”

When I ask how exactly they’ll extract the knowledge from his brain, Kurzweil bristles, as if the answer should be obvious: “Just send nanobots into my brain and reconstruct my recollections and memories.” The machines will capture everything: the piggyback ride to the grocery store, the bedtime reading of Tom Swift, the moment he and his father rejoiced when the letter of acceptance from MIT arrived. To provide the nanobots with even more information, Kurzweil is safeguarding the boxes of his dad’s mementos, so the artificial intelligence has as much data as possible from which to reconstruct him. Father 2.0 could take many forms, he says, from a virtual-reality avatar to a fully functioning robot … “If you can bring back life that was valuable in the past, it should be valuable in the future.”

Most of the comments at RoughType assume that Kurzweil is some kind of sociopath, and there has always been a fine line between genius and madness. Perhaps this does go some way to explaining why many in the singularian camp simply refuse to believe that their version of the future won’t happen – they are just looking for the parental approval they never had as a child.

Given the recent discussions of the effect of the Singlarity University, and the difficulty of discussing nanotechnology without getting sidetracked by discussions about life extension, nanofactories and human extension, someone recently commented that these ideas have ‘polluted the well (of nanoscience).’

The problem is that the propagation of these rather odd ideas is continuous, just when you think the last nanobot has been squashed you find another infestation in some corner of the interweb. Once people get it into their heads that nanofactories will be built there is no rational argument that will dissuade them – rather like a bunch of religious fanatics.

It’s a little like attempting to build rather splendid house, or if you subscribe to the nanotech saving humanity idea, a social and cultural centre, only to find that one of your neighbours sneaks in and regularly defecates in your swimming pool. It’s not the end of the world, but you rather wish that they would find something more positive to do. (This is the bit where I usually get challenged to prove whether there is any evidence that nanofactories will not work, and have to fish around for a suitable metaphor for attempting to prove a negative…)

Tagged with:
 

Invasion of the Chinese Nanobots

One of our old nanotech favourites, rabid sinophobe Lev Nazorov returns this week with a classic illustration of what happens when you read a bit of Drexler and let your imagination run wild.

Nazorov is rather obsessed with the Chinese threat to the US and contends that “China’s ultimate plan would involve the use of “molecular nano assemblers,” which are small self-replicating machines capable of moving through the ocean and destroying the US’s nuclear submarines. At that point America’s ability for “Mutual Assured Destruction” through nuclear weapons would be lost and China could either destroy the US with further nano-weapons or enforce an unconditional surrender.”

The proposed solution to this coming holocaust seems to be to produce a film to frighten people (and inspired by Al Gore, maybe get a Nobel Peace Prize instead of an Oscar)…

Let me now take a specific post-nuclear science or technology as an example. In 1986, Eric Drexler published his book, subtitled “The Coming Era of Nanotechnology,” and founded, with his wife, The Foresight Institute for nano research. I learned that the U.S. Congress refused, even in the 2000s, to allocate a dollar for this research. In the United States, Drexler, the American scientist of genius, was represented, due to the influence of producers of commercial nano goods, as a charlatan or an idiot.

In China, Drexler’s book was published on the Internet in English, with Chinese explanations of what some Chinese may find difficult to understand in English.

Today, more than 20 years after the publication of Drexler’s book, the Foresight Institute has ousted him: The Institute is without its founder and president. Some Americans tell me that there are other nanotechnological institutes in the United States, but I simply do not know about them because they are secret.

Yes, but who in the United States knows how far the development of nano weapons has advanced in China?

In 1945, Japan was a militarized country, complete with powerful intelligence/espionage. Yet the U.S. atomic bomb was such a surprise for Japan that it surrendered immediately and unconditionally.

The development of the atom bombs had been going on at many points in the United States and rumors about government secrets circulated freely in this free country.

Compare it to China, with its super-secret laboratories in craggy mountains, so that no one could drill a hole through the basement and install an instrument that would show what the lab is researching.

President Bush has never uttered a word about this secrecy. In the United States and the free West in general, the wages and salaries cannot be reduced by the government, while in China they can be reduced to the maintenance of a slave level. Hence, as a depression develops in the free West, many Westerners become financially linked with China and prefer to keep silent about China’s preparations to annihilate the free West.

Should an enlightening book on the subject be published, a tiny minority will read it. The major media believe that more money can be made by entertainment rather than by discussing China’s preparations to annihilate the free countries.

The way out is to produce a film worth its subject: the abyss ahead, facing the free world.

Tagged with: