Darrell Brookstein at Nanotechnology.com casts more light on the Nanodynamics IPO that wasn’t

“In mid 2007 and into last week, one single, unlucky investment bank raised ARWR $16.5 million at $5.78 per share with ¼ warrants at $7.06 (it’s now $2.10). They raised NANX $10.6 million at $5.92 (now $3.21). Now, oddly, they were unable, for whatever reason (amazed neither the company itself nor the underwriter have yet to release details at this late date), to bring private company, Nanodynamics, public on the Dubai Exchange last week.”

Tagged with:
 

The curse of nanotech strikes again, and this is a story it would be hard to make up.

Alan Shalleck has been doing a bit of poking around into the latest nanotech IPO debacle (quite a lot actually) and points the finger of blame at Global Crown Capital who appear to have been rather under capitalised. The allegations  are quite serious, calling into account the integrity of Global Crown Capital,  so  if the article suddenly disappears we will understand why. Just in case, i have reproduced the relevant part of Alan’s article below.

More than one source has told me that GCC could not, or would not, produce its share, $50 million, of the IPO proceeds. It was short by some significant amount. Here is where GCC, as an underwriter, violated the rules of underwriting. As I also have been told, GCC reneged in using its own capital to make up the shortage difference … and was arrogant with the Governors of the exchange about that deficiency not being a deciding condition for delisting, in the process antagonizing every DIFX official involved in the listing decision.

Given the funding deficiency, and no immediate willingness to make up the deficiency by the lead manager, the exchange then gave NanoDynamics’ management a choice of two delisting options: withdraw voluntarily or be asked to delist by the exchange. NDMX did the honorable thing … it “voluntarily” requested delisting and returned whatever funds it had received to the investors.

Most egregiously, GCC violated the underwriter’s credibility rule. An underwriter has to be ready to commit its very last dollar of capital to protect the success of an IPO that is not a “best efforts” offering. An underwriter’s only “outs” are “material adverse changes in the issuing company” or “materially adverse changes in the marketplace”. Neither occurred. I think GCC has a great deal of explaining to do to the entire nanotechnology or green industries if it ever wants to be considered again as an underwriter of any kind of stock offering by a needy Nanotechnology company.

As I mentioned yesterday they really need some better advisors.

Tagged with:
 

If at first you don’t succeed….Nanodynamics, one of the raft of diversified nanotechnology companies under pressure from investors to get an exit of any kind, have announced that they will be the first nanotechnology US company to be listed on the Dubai International Financial Exchange (DIFX).

You have to question the sanity of both the management and their advisors as pricing is expected to start next week.Nanodynamics attempted an IPO last year but shelved it after investors thought that raising $90 million on 2006 sales of $4 million may have been a bit too much risk to take. However, as the company was reported at the time of its last IPO attempt to be losing $1.5 million a month you can understand their need for capital.

The global credit crunch was the excuse for pulling out last time, and we can only assume, given the sea of red that covers trading screens from Tokyo to London this week, that the company is in quite desperate straits or is hoping that that Gulf based investors are dumber than those on Wall Street. The company claims to have chosen Dubai because “we are a global company with partners and customers around the world, including Europe, Russia, India, China and Japan.”