Creative Destruction - Hindu Style

Creative Destruction - Hindu Style

In October 2008, I was asked at the World Economic Forum along with other experts to address the main challenges facing nanotechnology. While environmental, health and safety concerns had been the preoccupation of many for 2008, this question posed by the WEF combined with the world economic crisis led me to consider the challenges of funding and commercializing of nanotechnology and other emerging technologies for 2009.
We can expect to hear much more of Joseph Schumpeter’s ideas of Creative Destruction  this year as the world comes to terms with the credit crunch, or recession as these events used to be known.  While the depths of a recession can be the best time to start a business, Microsoft is an oft cited example, this is scant consolation for the tens of thousands of companies that will not survive, and the millions who will lose their jobs as a result. An alternative scenario is Nietzsche’s earlier Shiva inspired version of creative destruction, with the new morality standing in the ruins of the old, which may be the long terms fate of a number of financial institutions and economies.

As a result, we published a note today looking at the five most significant issues which we see impacting the world of nanotechnologies in the coming year.

Feel free to disagree on the blog or contact us for more specific information.

Tagged with:
 

French Chemical Companies Protest Falling Nanotech Prices

With confidence in nanomaterials companies falling faster than UK house prices at the moment, France has done what it always does best, a government bail out.

The aid consists of giving €24 million to Arkema, and a further €20 million to a variety of other consortium members, or in the words of the Commission

GENESIS represents a total outlay of €107 million over five years. It will focus on developing nanomaterials based on formulations incorporating carbon nanotubes and copolymers with controlled architecture. These technologies should pave the way for the industrial development of materials with radically new properties in terms of mechanical resistance, thermal or electrical conductivity, or optical characteristics.

So in effect, despite Arkema setting up facilities to produce carbon nanotubes by the to hundreds of tons, they still haven’t found a market for enough of them. The background info from the EU indicates that the French government has spent two years already trying to bail out Arkema.

Knowing the speed at which governmemts move, Arkema must have started demading governmemt handouts even before it opened its CNT pilot plant in early 2006 which indicates that their market confidence must have been close to zero! At least it seems smarter than the US model, where a lack of products, markets and customers usually seems to be reason enough to attempt a $100 million IPO. 

I have seen this in a number of European countries but especially France where there are a number of quite large firms kept afloat by state aid with the rationale that if the government did not fund them then this or that technology would not exist in France.

So what we end up with is a kind of nanotechnology Common Agricultural Policy, where companies are paid to produce things that no one wants and the taxpayer foots the bill. Usually when anyone tries to reform the Common Agricultural Policy French Farmers start burning sheep in the streets of Paris or spraying the European Parliament with manure. Goodness knows what they could do with a few tons of unsold nanotubes – it could certainly stimulate the French toxicology sector! 

Tagged with: